Find the damage. Restore your foundation.
We investigate suspicious links, injected pages and indexing problems. What we learn guides your Ads, conversion fixes and AI-search content.
We provide negative SEO attack recovery in Canada for site owners: diagnose suspected attacks, repair damage and monitor for recurrence.
Toronto’s Trusted Agency | Forbes Agency Council Member





Claim your free digital marketing audit and growth strategy.






















SEO recovery, Google Ads, conversion fixes and AI-search visibility share insights, so each part strengthens the others.
We investigate suspicious links, injected pages and indexing problems. What we learn guides your Ads, conversion fixes and AI-search content.
We run paid search to reach customers while organic repairs are underway. Search-term data sharpens SEO priorities and landing-page messaging.
We fix the path from landing page to enquiry. Clearer pages make your SEO and Ads traffic work harder and show which messages earn leads.
We strengthen content for AI-search visibility using what the recovery audit reveals. The same clear content supports organic search and conversion work.
Injected spam and hostile backlinks hit Linara Custom Jewellery in Toronto. In 12 months, monthly organic clicks rose from 600 to 2,700.
Recovered monthly organic leads from 10 to 66 after injected spam pages and hostile backlinks. Removed the compromise, restored indexing and monitored recurrence across Canada.
A rogue must-use plugin cloaked responses by user agent; removed it, patched entry points and rotated credentials.
1,240 injected URLsA malicious scheduled task regenerated the sitemap; removed its database entry and purged cached XML.
1 recurring spam sitemapAn injected head hook rewrote canonicals on product templates; removed the hook and validated rendered HTML.
37 product canonicals corrupted| Oct ’24 | 1 | forensic snapshot preserved; forms, calls and orders deduplicated |
| Oct ’24 | 3 | persistent spam routes removed; credentials rotated and access restricted |
| Oct–Nov ’24 | 1240 | injected URLs returned 410; spam sitemaps removed |
| Nov ’24 | 8600 | spam backlinks assessed; no blanket disavow without manipulation evidence |
| Nov–Dec ’24 | 37 | product canonicals repaired; cache and rendering tests passed |
| Jan–Mar ’25 | 28 | damaged jewellery pages restored from verified catalogue content |
| Apr–Jun ’25 | 164 | internal links restored to legitimate product and consultation pages |
| Jul–Sep ’25 | 12 | weekly security, indexation and lead-quality checks completed |
1 consultation page retained Toronto relevance without fabricated storefront claims
1 appointment guide linked to official transit planning resources
2 consultation FAQs addressed transit access without claiming a Yorkville address
1 pricing guide separated jewellery prices, tax and delivery
Want the same breakdown for your site? It starts with a free audit.
Get A Free AuditIn QliqQliq incident audits, 66.7% showed no verified external abuse. These figures make diagnosis your first move.
80 of 240 audits; verification does not establish malicious SEO intent
QliqQliq incident audits160 of 240 audits; spam backlinks alone were insufficient evidence
QliqQliq incident audits80 incidents; excludes lost revenue, advertising and ongoing SEO
QliqQliq recovery project records30 of 240 domains; a manual action does not establish external causation
GSC of client sites + QliqQliq incident audits| Incident segment | Audits | Verified abuse | Median organic loss | Median recovery fee | Median recovery days | Manual action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spam-link alerts | 60 | 10% | 8% | $1,200 | 21 | 5% |
| Scraped-content alerts | 50 | 10% | 12% | $1,800 | 28 | 4% |
| Injected-page alerts | 40 | 60% | 44% | $4,800 | 56 | 25% |
| Malicious redirect alerts | 35 | 60% | 52% | $4,200 | 42 | 20% |
| Impersonation alerts | 30 | 30% | 18% | $2,400 | 35 | 0% |
| Mixed-signal incidents | 25 | 60% | 61% | $6,400 | 70 | 32% |
240 mutually exclusive primary reports; 80 verified-abuse cases and 30 manual actions. Organic loss: median 28-day GSC click decline versus preceding 28 days across each segment. Fees and recovery days cover verified cases only; recovery means containment and remediation, not guaranteed ranking restoration. Source: QliqQliq incident audits, GSC of client sites, recovery project records
Positions 1–10; branded queries excluded. Ads and other SERP features reduce organic visibility; this chart does not measure attack-related traffic loss. Source: GSC of client sites: 8 recovery providers versus 24 service sites, 12 months
Reviews: median Google review count per sampled provider. Firms: sampled providers advertising recovery services; 80 total. Review counts are not ranking requirements or evidence of recovery competence. Source: QliqQliq Maps grid scan, 25 points per city
audits with verified external abuse indicators
QliqQliq incident auditsaudits without verified external abuse indicators
QliqQliq incident auditsspam-link alerts with verified abuse beyond backlink-tool toxicity scores
QliqQliq backlink and server-log reviewinjected-page alerts with verified unauthorised content
QliqQliq incident auditsredirect alerts with verified unauthorised redirect rules
QliqQliq server-log and configuration reviewmonthly Canadian searches across recovery-service keywords
Keyword Planner, 12-month averageaverage Canadian recovery-service keyword CPC
Keyword Plannersampled recovery-query SERPs containing search ads
DataForSEO, 200 Canadian SERPssampled recovery-query SERPs containing a Map Pack
QliqQliq SERP capture, 200 SERPsrecovery-service organic clicks from mobile devices
GSC of client sites, 8 recovery providersmedian remediation fee across verified incidents
QliqQliq recovery project records, 80 incidentsmedian containment time after access was granted
QliqQliq incident response logs, 80 incidentsverified incidents requiring hosting or CMS changes
QliqQliq recovery project recordsverified incidents requiring a disavow submission after link review
QliqQliq recovery project recordsverified incidents with repeat compromise within 90 days
QliqQliq incident monitoringproviders requesting GSC access before quoting
QliqQliq mystery-shopper testproviders recommending disavow before reviewing backlinks
QliqQliq mystery-shopper testproviders promising a fixed ranking-recovery date
QliqQliq mystery-shopper testmedian first reply among providers that responded
QliqQliq mystery-shopper test, 28 repliesproviders giving no reply within 5 business days
QliqQliq mystery-shopper testMethod: 240 incident audits · 9,600 URLs inspected · 200 recovery-query SERPs captured · 80 recovery-provider profiles scanned · 32 mystery enquiries; self-selected sample, not national prevalence. Abuse indicators do not establish attacker identity or intent. Costs in CAD. · Updated Q3 2026
We review your site and Search Console for signs of compromise and lost visibility.
The QUIQ Pixel finds technical issues in hours; we inspect backlinks and injected pages.
We remove spam and repair the compromise, using tested scripts and AI tools to ship fixes in hours or days.
We restore legitimate pages for indexing and fix the path from search visits to enquiries.
We monitor for repeat abuse. Your 24/7 Glass Box Portal shows rankings, leads, spend and changes.
| MasterSEO | Typical agency | |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Fixes and pages shipped in hours or days | Fixes and pages queued for weeks |
| Visibility | 24/7 portal with a log of every change | Periodic updates without a live change log |
| Focus | Calls, leads and revenue | Technical activity and rankings |
| Exclusivity | 1 major client per niche per region | No niche exclusivity |
I want you to see calls and leads, not decipher a technical report. My team handles the details; you see the work and the numbers.
Anton Kovalchuk
Founder
We inspect your search data, backlinks, pages and technical health for evidence of abuse. If we find a compromise, we plan the repairs, address affected pages and monitor for recurrence. Your free audit is the starting point.
Not necessarily. In QliqQliq incident audits, 66.7% of domains had no verified external abuse indicators. A drop warrants investigation, not an assumption. In client-site and incident-audit records, 12.5% had a manual action visible in Search Console.
Timing depends on the damage and your market. Our QUIQ Pixel finds technical issues in hours, and our tested scripts and AI tools let us ship fixes and pages in hours or days. Search recovery itself can take longer.
The median remediation fee among verified incidents in QliqQliq recovery project records was $3,200. Your scope and fee depend on what the investigation finds. Start with the free audit.
No. We do not guarantee rankings. We investigate the evidence, carry out the agreed work and track outcomes so you can see what is changing.
Your Glass Box Portal is available 24/7. It shows rankings, leads, spend and a log of every change. We also monitor for repeat abuse so you have a clear view after repairs.
Written and reviewed by Anton Kovalchuk, Founder of QliqQliq · Updated November 2026Find out what is hurting your visibility and what to do next.